Saturday, December 29, 2007

A Little Dare for the Internet Generation...

Nine seconds. That's the length of the attention span of the average fully acclimated internet user, according to experts at MIT. Apparently, in the age of endless channels of content at the click of a mouse, we have turned into goldfish, no longer capable of extended thought, and long term analytical reasoning. No wonder, then, that our political leadership accomplishes so little in the long term, and revolves around current campaign buzz and canned talking points.

It's all our fault, though. We, as a democratic society, have become complacent victims of our ever decreasing attention spans, leading to a government full of self serving politicians who find it less and less difficult to manipulate us with consulted images and slick presentations, and then promptly rob us blind of both our rights and material wealth. We are the electorate. Why would we put people in power who handle it so poorly, and act in such a self serving way? Because our attention span is so short, and our focus so shallow, that we never stop to spend thoughtful time in consideration of our society's leadership, and our role in determining who and what that leadership is.


8 Short Years is dedicated to expanding that narrow scope of focus, and to providing a long term view of our political landscape. Eight years is long enough, in our society, to see massive social and technological change. With an organized and informed electorate, it can also be long enough to see substantial political change.

Stop and think for a moment about eight years ago. New Year's Eve, 1999 seems like an eternity ago. Bill Clinton was sailing out of office on an economy beginning to show signs of the market correction to come. The country was split on who had actually won the election to replace him. A large chunk of the country was concerned about the supposed impact of the Y2K bug, some of them enough to fortify bunkers with guns and food. "Google" was still an adjective connected to eyes rather than a verb connected to damn near all the data in the world. A majority Republican congress was enjoying a juggernaut run of control, with no end in sight (oh, and everyone pretty much assumed that most of them were not the kind of guys to be arrested in a bathroom for willie wagging. How little did we know).

9/11 was just another date on the calendar.

The face of our country has changed dramatically in the last eight years, and the people driving that change were small in number, and not focused on any of the topics that government should be focused on. By creating a polarized bipartisan process, they have effectively erased the power of our vote; 50-50 results in the last two presidential elections show how easy it is to rig a situation where they get the president they want. If I vote for him, and you vote against him, our votes cancel each other out. When it becomes finite, it's sent to the Supreme Court, who through jurisprudent oversight, determine the winner. How is this democratic, and why are we letting it continue?

Congress, on the other hand, is not polarized. Because so many career politicians have been in power for decades, they have the long term view to understand compromise and diplomacy, and calculated long term strategies to accomplish a goal. It's time that we, the electorate, stop playing Democracy Light: The Interactive Card Game, and start approaching our role in this society with the same intelligence, comprehension, and calculated action that our leaders do.

What does that mean? It means that we educate ourselves on our history, rights, and powers. We dig for the facts on legislation and issues at stake, we learn the history and nuances of that issue, and we understand the impact that such legislation can have. We shine a hard light on political candidates, not focused on sensationalistic non-issues such as marital history and crime in the family, but on political connections, corporate interests, and voting history. We elect progressive politicians with like minded goals, we demand action from them, and we hold them accountable for their performance. This is our team, we pick them, and choose whether they stay or go, and it's past time we stopped sticking with losers simply because they've elevated glibness to an art form.

Eight short years. Two Presidential elections, four congressional elections, countless state and municipal elections. Plenty of time for all of us to have the government we want, the society we want here in America. Over the next eight years, I dare you to believe in Democracy, and to take an active part in it. Together, we can examine the people and decisions being made in depth, put them in the context of history, and try to strip away the emotional camouflage so that the bare facts are exposed. If we can find a way to productively debate and compromise on issues the way congress does, we can wield the same kind of power.

I hope you have it in you. I'll be here when you decide.

3 comments:

booger2wasaton said...

i miss the good ol' days when you could just string someone up for messin with ya or take em out back and shoot em but now everyones all worried about the "oxygen giving" lil green buggers and protesting the smoke that comes shooting out the gun! To qoute Iggy and the Stooges - NO FUN!

Anonymous said...

Good luck, Chris - we need that rational middle ground more than ever - these past four decades, with the faith-based high school football program mentality have been a disaster for this country (winner gets the keys to the city's vault) - I hope you'll be that third leg which keeps our country standing, instead of falling over all the time.

Unknown said...

booger, I don't really know what to respond to your comment.

Jrup, I hope I can in some way contribute to the overall positive progression of our country. It's important to remember, though, that the faith based high school footballers are only part of the equation in our political climate. It's equally composed of american apologists with an overblown sense of liberal guilt, who feel it is an impropriety to have patriotic pride, shameless opportunists who ride the current high polling buzzwords, and self appointed demogogues who build a power base on the back of those they claim to speak on behalf of. The problems in our social landscape are not so easily divided down partisan stereotypes, and if I accomplish nothing else with this endeavor, I want to clearly highlight that neither the ideals, nor the obstacles to the achievement of those ideals, can be painted so definitively with a Red or Blue brush. Bipartisan polarization is a method of control of the populace which focuses the otherwise productive energies of our citizenry into narrow, black and white channels, which repress independent thought. I encourage you to look past the perpetuated stereotypes, and examine each political candidate purely on their merits, corporate connections, and voting history, and strip away party rhetoric. The only way you will leadership worth following is if you can approach your analysis of them in an intellectually honest fashion, and judge them for what they are, as opposed to what they are not. I had a real problem with being told the reason to vote for Kerry is because he's not Bush. I'm not looking for the sugarwater solution of "well, it's the lesser of two evils." If I am not casting my vote for someone I believe can do the job well, and with good intention, then I am not taking seriously my role as a steward of the leadership of the country.

That extended response out of the way, thank you for reading, and for your kind comments.

Spread the word...

   Add to Technorati Favorites